<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mashup: Time, Death, and Ballastexistenz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shiftjournal.com/2010/01/29/mashup-time-death-and-ballastexistenz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shiftjournal.com/2010/01/29/mashup-time-death-and-ballastexistenz/</link>
	<description>Neurodiversity: autism and Asperger considered in light of social and evolutionary changes; &#34;autistic&#34; explored as a legitimate way of being in the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:37:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: abfh</title>
		<link>http://www.shiftjournal.com/2010/01/29/mashup-time-death-and-ballastexistenz/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>abfh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiftjournal.com/?p=1248#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Just realized that my first comment was a bit mixed up; the condolences were supposed to go to the Ballastexistenz post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just realized that my first comment was a bit mixed up; the condolences were supposed to go to the Ballastexistenz post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abfh</title>
		<link>http://www.shiftjournal.com/2010/01/29/mashup-time-death-and-ballastexistenz/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>abfh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiftjournal.com/?p=1248#comment-190</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say that the taboo against speaking ill of the dead is more a matter of social pleasantries than an actual expectation that everyone&#039;s memories will change.  Complaining about a dead person might be taken as a show of disrespect toward those who are grieving.  Also, continuing to criticize a person who is dead (and therefore unable to respond in any way to the criticism) can seem like a petty and pointless grudge.

Often the person who writes the eulogy did not know the dead person very well, such as when it&#039;s written by a minister who has only seen the person on his or her best behavior on Sundays at church.

My condolences on your loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that the taboo against speaking ill of the dead is more a matter of social pleasantries than an actual expectation that everyone&#8217;s memories will change.  Complaining about a dead person might be taken as a show of disrespect toward those who are grieving.  Also, continuing to criticize a person who is dead (and therefore unable to respond in any way to the criticism) can seem like a petty and pointless grudge.</p>
<p>Often the person who writes the eulogy did not know the dead person very well, such as when it&#8217;s written by a minister who has only seen the person on his or her best behavior on Sundays at church.</p>
<p>My condolences on your loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

